I went to a candidate forum last night for City Council districts A, B, C and at-large. As an experiment, I kept a crude scorecard as the District B candidates answered questions. I marked a + if I liked their answer, a – if I disliked it, and a 0 if it didn’t move me either way. Then I added up a score for each candidate, adding a point for each + and subtracting a point for each -. Here’s the results:
Brown +++––0+ 2 Duplantier +0++00- 2 Head ++++0++ 6 Landry +0++0++ 5 Pratt +000-00 0 Truehill +++++++ 7
The questions were about: slots at the Fairgrounds, development at Broad & Tulane, the BNOB plan, the city’s master plan, race relations and blighted housing. Each candidate also got to make a concluding statement. The first question was yes/no, and everyone answered the same, so everyone got the + for that one.
As you can see from my little chart, my responses were mostly positive. Pratt (the incumbent) left me cold. Brown was doing pretty well for a while, until he choked on the master plan question. Truehill made the best impression on me, followed by Head, with Landry close behind.
Discover more from b.rox
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Interesting. I wish that I had seen that. I’m leaning towards Head at the moment.
I’m still trying to make up my mind on the mayor.
[…] a lot to digest, but I did keep score (like I did for a District B forum last year). At the end of each response, I gave each candidate a mark. If my impression was generally […]